For today’s shout out I wanted to focus on one of my all-time favourite historians and authors, and all-round good guy, Matthew Lewis!

Matthew_Lewis

Matthew is an author, historian and also the Education Officer for the Richard III society – a pretty big responsibility. He’s written a number of books including:

  • The Wars of the Roses: The Key Players in the Struggle for Supremacy
  • The Survival of the Princes in the Tower: Murder, Mystery and Myth
  • Richard III: Loyalty Binds Me
  • Richard Duke of York: King by Right
  • Medieval Britain in 100 Facts
  • The Wars of the Roses in 100 Facts
  • Henry III: Son of Magna Carter
  • Steven and Matilda: Cousins of Anarchy (his latest book)

It’s clear that Matthew Lewis has a love of history and one thing I love and respect about his writing is that he’s fair. There’s no pressing of personal thoughts and beliefs, instead, he uses primary sources to peel back the long-held beliefs about history and presents the facts as they are and allows the reader to make up their minds. It’s clear that he does a huge amount of research when he writes a book and this adds a wealth of credibility to his work. I’ve read six of Matthew’s books and I’ve loved each and every one of them.

I’ve had several really great conversations with Matthew about the Wars of the Roses and although we don’t always see eye to eye (Richard III did kill my beloved Sir William Brandon after all!) he’s a man that knows what he’s talking about and can also have a good laugh.

If you haven’t read any of Matthew Lewis’ books then I strongly encourage you to get to your local bookstore or jump online and order them – I promise you won’t regret it!

You can find Matthew on:

Twitter

Facebook

 

Henry VI and Margaret of Anjou: A Marriage of Unequals

By Amy Licence

 

Amy Licence’s latest book on Henry VI and Margaret of Anjou is one of her best to date. Thoroughly researched and written in such fluent and easy to read style, Amy details the turbulent and often confusing life of King Henry VI while also shining a light onto Margaret, an often-maligned Queen.

While I have read quite a lot about Henry VI and Margaret of Anjou, a large portion of what I have read only details Margaret’s life in relation to her husband. She is mentioned often as a side thought, or merely reacting to the actions of those around her, yet Licence portrays Margaret as her own person. She details Margaret’s life, from her family lineage to her upbringing to the events that saw her become Queen of England. She discusses how Margaret’s upbringing, the events she witnessed, the people she knew, how these helped to form her beliefs, both religious and political.

Throughout her time as Queen, Licence details Margaret’s behaviour, decisions and reactions as an individual, rather than as an extension of her husband. It was utterly fascinating to view Margaret in this new light, to credit her with her own decisions and thoughts – as best as have been recorded – and to see that in fact, she was a strong, determined woman, rather than a she-wolf seeking nothing but revenge. In England she was defined by strict gender roles, a woman and a Queen was not to be a political leader. Yet growing up in France Margaret had seen strong women become leaders and fighters for what they believed in. Margaret was a Queen but she was also a wife and mother and it was these last two relationships that continued to push her forward, to fight for her family, despite the terrible times she endured.

Licence also explores Henry’s deeply personal religious beliefs and how these affected not only his behaviour as a man but also how it had a huge impact upon the decisions he made, or in some cases, did not make, as a King. Henry VI is often portrayed as weak and mad, having no personal strength or the ability to make decisions for himself. Yet Licence shows that Henry VI could be strong, he could be a leader, and that he often responded to the situations around him on the basis of strongly held religious beliefs, not because he was incapable of doing so.

I also valued the detail in which events and decisions were described. Major political moves were not simply mentioned and glossed over, they were discussed with depth, with primary letters often included, to show a true understanding of the events of the time. As a reader I wanted to keep reading, to find out what happened next, to learn what drove Henry and Margaret to make the extraordinary decisions that they made.

I thoroughly enjoyed Licence’s book on Henry VI and Margaret of Anjou. It is clear that she has spent a great deal of time delving into primary sources to gain a deeper understanding of who Henry and Margaret were as people, not just as a King and Queen, and in doing so has brought their lives to the forefront once more. I would highly recommend adding this book to your bookshelf!

9188WGCCbpL

Richard III and the Bosworth Campaign

By P.W. Hammond

 Hammond’s book on Richard III and the Battle of Bosworth is a fascinating and detailed recount of one of the most significant battles in England’s history. Once I started reading I was hooked and thoroughly enjoyed every chapter.

The book focuses on the events leading up to the Battle of Bosworth. Hammond explores the short reign of Richard III, how he came to the be on the English throne, the events that unfolded throughout his reign and the led up to the Battle of Bosworth. On the other side of the coin, Hammond detailed who Henry Tudor was, why he stated he had a claim to the English crown and how he gathered his men and supplies and then set sail to England to take on a ruling King.

It was very interesting to read how the two army’s, led by Richard III and Henry Tudor respectively, maneuvered their way through Wales and England to meet near the town of Dadlington. There was so much happening in the weeks that led up to the battle and Hammond discusses the decisions and maneuvers made by Richard III and Henry Tudor to give the reader a greater understanding of what happened.

The Battle itself is outlined in fascinating detail, although the only fault of this entire book is that since it was published more information about the location of the battle and the resting place of Richard III has come to life. This is no fault of Hammond as he brilliantly used the information at hand at the time of writing of this book.

Hammond also details the types of armour and weapons the soldiers would have used as well as various battle techniques that were employed. This was fascinating to read as learning how the men fought and with what weapons and protection, really helps to gain a greater understanding of how the battle unfolded and the sheer impact it had upon English history.

Hammond also describes the events that unfolded after Henry Tudor’s victory at Bosworth. He discusses how Henry Tudor, now King Henry VII, reign affected England and had an impact on international relations.

I also enjoyed the unbiased examination of the lead up to the Battle of Bosworth, the battle itself and the aftermath. Many books are heavily biased for or against Richard III and this tainted view can affect how the events of the age are described. Hammond’s analysis of the battle strays away from any bias and simply details the events, the battle and the aftermath and allows the reader to decide what they think and feel of Henry Tudor’s victory.

Although new information regarding the location of the battle and what happened to Richard III’s body after the battle has come to life, I would still strongly recommend this book to anyone interested in English history. Hammond’s book is a fascinating read that provides a great deal of information with beautiful, relevant images included. Highly recommended!

61CfG5RvF9L._SX345_BO1,204,203,200_

The Pilgrimage of Grace initially formed as a series of revolts which originated in Lincolnshire. The people were unhappy with the dissolution of their Abbey in Louth, upset with many of the government commissions in the area which were being conducted to look at the resources that the smaller monasteries had as well as the conduct of the clergy. There was also widespread rumour that the government would confiscate the jewels, plate and wealth of the monasteries and also impose new taxes upon the people.

On 1st October 1536 Thomas Kendall, Vicar of St. James’ Church, Louth preached a sermon warning the people of his congregation that the Church was in danger. The following day Nicholas Melton and a group of people from the city captured John Heneage, the Bishop of Lincoln’s registrar, as he tried to deliver the assessment of the clergy as ordered by Thomas Cromwell. Melton ripped the papers from Heneage’s hand and burned them. Melton and his followers took Heneage to Legbourne Nunnery were several more of the King’s commissioners were working. They were also captured. On the 3rd it was reported that approximately 3000 men marched to Caistor in an attempt to capture the commissioners working there however the commissioners managed to escape.

From here the towns of Caistor and Horncastle joined the rebellion. On the 4th October Dr John Raynes, Chancellor of the Bishop of Lincoln and Thomas Wulcey, who worked for Thomas Cromwell, were captured and beaten to death by the rebels. On the same day, the rebels drew up a list of articles which contained five complaints for the King. These were complaints against the suppression of the monasteries, complaints against various taxes being imposed or rumours of taxes and importantly complaints against those people who were working for the King, including Thomas Cromwell. The rebels felt that these people were from low birth and were only supporting the dissolution of the monasteries to line their own pockets with the wealth of the churches.

Over the next three days, more support came from Towes, Hambleton Hill, and Dunholm as well as from Horncastle and Louth. When the rebels met at Lincoln Cathedral it is reported that they had somewhere between 10 000 and 20 000 men gathered.

Meanwhile, on the 8th October in Beverley, Yorkshire a lawyer named Robert Aske became the leader of more men rebelling against the rumours surrounding the dissolution of the monasteries and the revolt happening in Lincolnshire. Then on the 9th October 1536 the rebels of Horncastle, dispatched their petition of grievances to the King. On the 11th the King’s reply to the commoners formally came.
“Concerning choosing of counsellors,” the king wrote, “I never have read, heard nor known, that princes’ counsellors and prelates should be appointed by rude and ignorant common people; nor that they were persons meet or of ability to discern and choose meet and sufficient counsellors for a prince. How presumptuous then are ye, the rude commons of one shire, and that one of the most brute and beastly of the whole realm and of least experience, to find fault with your prince for the electing of his counsellors and prelates, and to take upon you, contrary to God’s law and man’s law, to rule your prince whom ye are bound to obey and serve with both your lives, lands, and goods, and for no worldly cause to withstand.

As to the suppression of houses and monasteries, they were granted to us by the parliament and not set forth by any counsellor or counsellors upon their mere will and fantasy, as you, full falsely, would persuade our realm to believe. And where ye alledge that the service of God is much thereby diminished, the truth thereof is contrary ; for there are no houses suppressed where God was well served, but where most vice, mischief, and abomination of living was used : and that doth well appear by their confessions, subscribed with their own hands, in the time of our visitations. And yet were suffered a great many of them, more than we by the act needed, to stand ; wherein if they amend not their living, we fear we have more to answer for than for the suppression of all the rest. And as for their hospitality, for the relief of poor people, we wonder ye be not ashamed to affirm, that they have been a great relief to our people, when a great many, or the most part, hath not past 4 or 5 religious persons in them and divers but one, which spent the substance of the goods of their house in nourishing vice and abominable living. Now, what unkindness and unnaturality may we impute to you and all our subjects that be of that mind that had rather such an unthrifty sort of vicious persons should enjoy such possessions, profits and emoluments as grow of the said houses to the maintenance of their unthrifty life than we, your natural prince, sovereign lord and king, who doth and hath spent more in your defences of his own than six times they be worth.”

Clearly, the King was not impressed that the people of his realm would dare stand up in rebellion against him and his government. In response, he sent Charles Brandon, Duke of Suffolk to Lincoln to keep an eye on the rebels. Brandon and his men made their way to Stamford where on the 12th Brandon wrote to the King asking what his orders were. He asked Henry VIII if they should be allowed to pardon the traitors in Lincolnshire or if they should ride forth to suppress the rebels in the north. Brandon worried that if they should pardon the rebels and ride North that if the rebels in Lincolnshire should decide to revolt once more then they would be stuck between two rebelling parties.

Meanwhile, the rebellion was now spreading and it was reported that all the people of Yorkshire were now up in arms as well as men coming from East Riding and Marshland to join the rebellion. It was around this time that Robert Ask began to refer to the rebellion as a Pilgrimage seeking the King’s support in preserving the Church and the punishment of those subverting the law.

On the 15th October, Henry VIII wrote to Brandon again detailing that he should instruct the rebels to surrender their weapons and give all the information they can about how the rebellion started and if they do so they would be dismissed without any further problems. Henry also demanded that Brandon and the Earl of Shrewsbury who was supporting the Duke, should gather the leaders of the rebellion and question them. The King also stated that he was sending Brandon soldiers on foot and horseback for support. (L&P Vol 11. 717).

From Stamford Brandon and his men moved forward to Lincoln. Meanwhile, the rebels marched to Pontefract Castle where Lord Darcy and several other leading men had gathered for safety. However the Castle fell on the 21st and those within, including Lord Darcy, joined the rebellion as part of their leadership.

On the same day, a herald from Henry VIII was sent to Pontefract Castle to read a proclamation from the King. However, Robert Aske refused to let the proclamation be read. Aske wanted to take the Pilgrimage’s petition straight to the King.

By now the two sides were vastly different in numbers. Brandon and his men only made up approximately 3200 soldiers, the combined forces of Shrewsbury and the Duke of Norfolk only adding a further 6000 while the rebels, according to Sir Brian Hastyngs writing to Shrewsbury were reported to be ‘above 40,000’.

On the 19th October, Henry VIII wrote to Brandon advising him that if he could not subdue the rebels by means of conversation…
“then you shall, with your forces run upon them and with all extremity “destroy, burn, and kill man, woman, and child the terrible example of all others, and specially the town of Louth because to this rebellion took his beginning in the same.”

Brandon’s job was clear, he was to stop the rebellion by means of negotiations or if that did not work then he was to make the King’s presence known and to have no mercy upon all those that rose up against the King.

Finally, on the 26th October, the rebels of the Pilgrimage of Grace paused at Scawsby Leys, near Doncaster where they met the Duke of Norfolk and his army. Despite vastly outnumbering Norfolk and his men Robert Aske decided to negotiate with the Duke. It was agreed that two representatives of the Pilgrimage, Sir Robert Bowes and Sir Ralph Ellerker would take the rebels petition to the King. A general truce was proclaimed and Robert Aske ordered the disbanding of the Pilgrimage.

While the King seemed to negotiate with the rebels Brandon was to remain in Lincoln. He and his men were to keep the peace upon the area and to keep an eye out for any further signs of rebellion. He was also charged with seeking out any further stirrers of the rebellion and gaining information from them. Brandon was supplied with military guns and wrote to inform the King that all was quiet and that he had no need for further reinforcements.

In November the Pilgrimage representatives Sir Ralph Ellerker and Sir Robert Bowes met with the Duke of Norfolk and other members of the council. After a great deal of discussion, the council and the Duke of Norfolk agreed that a general pardon would be given to all the rebels and that their complaints would be taken to a council meeting at York to be discussed. The rebels appeared to be happy with this decision and on the 3rd of December 1536 a general pardon was read to the rebels and they dispersed and went back to their homes.

The King took an unnaturally friendly manner with Robert Aske, talking to him and behaving in a most friendly way to a man who had dared to stand up to the King’s laws. It is thought that Henry decided to take a friendly tone with Aske in the hopes to gain more information from him about who the leaders of the rebellion were. Yet despite all the King’s talk, there was no meeting or parliament held to discuss the rebels’ complaints. This lack of action caused frustration and anger among some of the rebels and in January 1537 a fresh rebellion broke out in East Riding, West Riding, Lancashire, Cumberland and Westmorland. Although these revolts were smaller than that of the previous year the rebels had broken their promise to not riot against the King. This time the King acted swiftly and he commanded that those responsible for the rebellions to be tried and punished. Over the next few over one hundred people involved in the Pilgrimage of Grace and rebellions were tried and sentenced to the traitor’s death of being hung, drawn and quartered.

Rebel leaders such as Robert Aske and Lord Darcy were taken to the Tower of London. Aske was found guilty of his crimes and sentenced to be hung in chains from the battlement at York where he would die a slow, painful death from exposure and starvation.

Pilgramige of Grace

Tewkesbury: Eclipse of the House of Lancaster 1471

By Steven Goodchild

Pen and Sword Publishing are well known for their wide range of books focusing on battles throughout history and Goodchild’s book is another addition to this fantastic range.

Focusing on the Battle of Tewkesbury, Steven Goodchild examines battle and the political and personal events leading up to the famous day of 4 May 1471. He explores the lives of Edward IV, Henry VI, the Earl of Warwick, Margaret of Anjou, Edward Prince of Wales, as well as several other prominent political figures at the time to gain a greater understanding of why this battle took place.  Tewkesbury was one of the most decisive battles in England’s history up to that point in history, and it was more than just about who should sit on the English throne. There were a number of personal and political motives behind the battle and Goodchild does a fantastic job of exploring these to give the reader a fully rounded understanding of why the battle had to take place.

He steps the reader through the events of the battle, from Edward IV’s army chasing the army of Margaret of Anjou, through to the morning of the battle, the battle itself and then the bloody aftermath. He details the various versions of the battle that have been handed down throughout history and which report of the battle is most accurate and why. He also outlines the Lancastrian’s famous flight after the battle, either through the bloody meadow or to Tewkesbury Abbey where many sought sanctuary.

It was fascinating to read how the battle unfolded and why individual players within the battle made the moves they did, or in one case, made no move at all! Goodchild outlines where the battle took place and gives the reader a guide on how to walk the trail around the fields surrounding Tewkesbury Abbey. Having walked the battle site myself, Goodchild’s guide is a valuable resource. A person wanting to walk the site can quite easily follow the guide in the book. I do love the addition of the battle walks within Pen and Swords ‘battle books’ as they help to bring each battle to the reader and the present point in time.

In addition, Goodchild outlines the aftermath of the battle, giving the reader some detail about the years that followed and the affects the battle of Tewkesbury had on the people of England. He also talks about the weapons that would have been used within the battle. I found this part very interesting as I learnt a lot about weaponry and how the battle played out. Not to mention the horrific injures people would have sustained!

I thoroughly enjoyed Steven Goodchild’s book on the Battle of Tewkesbury. It is evident that the book is well researched and the amount of detail included about the events leading up to the battle, the battle itself and the political aftermath ties the book together well. I am enjoying Pen and Swords books on historical battles, and I think Godchild’s book on Tewkesbury is a fantastic addition – highly recommended.

51sq5gjycbL